Many authors ask me what I'd like them to write about. Personally, I think that's making it a little too easy on yourself. It's clever, because it'll be hard to refuse an article if I've asked for it first, but maybe not the kind of clever I'm looking for. So here is a list of some of the things I look at when I get an abstract, translated into a series of do's and don'ts.What it comes down to, in short, is: be original and give me something that stands out of the crowd.
- It surprises me too, but despite the survey showing that early Imperial Rome is the most popular subject, I actually get more Greek and Hellenistic abstracts. I have no proposals about say, Germanicus' campaigns, Hadrian's relation to the army or Trajan in Parthia...
- Fit your article to a theme. By far the best way to get me interested is to focus your article on the theme for an issue. Want to have an even better chance? Be original, find an angle that's unusual. Pick a subject for your article that allows you, in your conclusion, to say something of relevance about the theme as a whole.
- I like abstracts that propose to use less commonly used sources. Can you paint a picture with inscriptions, papyri, archaeology or non-Western sources?
- Almost everything in Ancient history has been written about before, but some subjects are much more well-trodden than others: Don't propose an article on Thermopylae (the famous one, that is) unless you have a really interesting angle.
- Don't send me a full article. A 500 word abstract is much more likely to be read and inserted into an issue's plan.
- Almost any other military history magazine will ask you about illustrations. We will too, even though we are often able to help out. Include some reasoned thoughts about photography or illustrations. Yes, we do have artists we commission for artwork, but there is a limited budget. In other words: if you have some specific, reasonably accessible artefacts in mind that could serve to illustrate the article, then tell me so. If you have your own photos, even better.
Photography
If you plan to submit your own photos for an article, there are a few extra caveats to keep in mind:
- Make sure the photos are your own or that you have written permission from the original owner to publish the photos.
- photos you find online are often problematic. In general, screen resolution is about 72dpi, while we print at 300. In other words, to print a photo at the same size as it appears on your screen, it will have to be about four times bigger, but retain sufficient clarity and sharpness to look good. Any photo manipulation program provides a way to enlarge photos. That works up to about 110% enlargement. Larger than that and you'll need specialized filters and functions, but a loss of quality is inevitable.
- If you take the photos yourself, make sure they're large enough (see above). As a rule of thumb, a 5MP photo is big enough to fill 1/2 page, provided the item you're photographing fills the entire image.
- Make sure your photo is well lit, in focus and without reflections. I am sometimes willing to compromise if the latter is not too bad or unobtrusive, provided the first two are spot on.
1) the subject is ...(so obscure) people will need a lot of background knowlege to be able to understand the issues at stake. My answer would be that you underestimate the reader at your own peril. Ask yourself if all the extra information is really essential for the point you are trying to make.
2) I did so much research! And you want to see that reflected in the length of your article? I prefer quality over quantity.
If I think of anything else, I'll add it to this post.







