AW on Facebook AW on Twitter AW RSS Feed

Commentarii

As you may or may not know, getting good quality illustrations for our articles is a constant concern for me. Simply put, I can illustrate Roman imperial stuff forever and a day, but when it comes to Roman Republican soldiers, Alexander's troops or, dear me, those wonderfully interesting Successor armies, it's another story.

One possibility would be to use more reenactors to illustrate the magazine. Provided they wear kit that qualifies as an accurate reproduction, this could give the reader a high resolution and detailed view of what soldiers in a certain period looked like. Again, the majority consists of Roman Imperial reenactors, but there are more and more late Romans - not always easy to illustrate - Greeks, Celts and even some Macedonians. I should investigate the availability of Bronze Age reenactors, but I'm prepared for a pleasant surprise.

So what do you think - provided I can get quality photos of quality reproductions - should we use reenactors more or not?

Post a comment below or vote in the poll on the homepage (bottom right).


Tagged in: Reenactment , Magazine , Articles
Trackback(0)
Comments (5)Add Comment
Textiles
written by caiustarquitius, June 05, 2008
In general I like your idea. However, most textiles displayed by reenectors do not match what can be achieved in a drawing - So this would be the only resentment I have. If you find reenactors with textile reconstructions or reproductions, go ahead. smilies/smiley.gif
Reenactor's physique
written by pcaravel, June 06, 2008
My main concern about reenactments is the fact that even when their equipment and armament is as good as possible, the reenactors' physique doesn't match with the actual warrior's which they try to represent. For example, a Roman battle-hardened centurion should have a highly muscular and tanned body, after so many years of active campaigning. It is very difficult for a modern reenactor to 'fit' in this model. It seems to me like persons trying to "dress-up" like an ancient warrior, not representing one.
Moreover, I think that it is more difficult for reenactors to show realistic battle scenes than it is for illustrators.
So I vote against using reenactors more in Ancient Warfare Magazine.
Poses
written by JaspertheManager, June 06, 2008
Hi!
Perhaps I should clarify a bit more:
- This is certainly not intended as a proposal to replace the current artwork!
- My idea would be to have reenactors pose statically with their equipment. No 'battle poses'.
Please No!
written by Vberriz, June 10, 2008
Jasper,

I really would avoid going that route - one of the things that I love about Ancient-Warfare is that it doesn't fall into the trap of most other magazines that have occasional features on this period - 90% of the time they use reenactors, and I feel that cheapens the overall article. More photos of items, murals, frescoes, vases, etc, yes - artwork, yes yes! However, a firm thumbs down for reenactors.

By the way, your magazine will end up being collected one day for the artwork. Congratulations on such a fine product!
By all means...
written by Magnus, June 13, 2008
Showing reenactors opens up an entirely new side to the academic portion of it. Using the term "cheapen" is a bit insulting. Maybe it's time we widen the perception of some academics and see what's on the other side eh?

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
For readers
For writers
For advertisers
Podcasts

Issue IV-1:Listen via iTunes Get the RSS feed

A multitude of peoples: Before Rome ruled Italy

Issue III-6:Listen via iTunes Get the RSS feed

Carnyx, Cornu and Signa:Battlefield Communications

Issue III-5:Listen via iTunes Get the RSS feed

The Imperial Nemesis: Rome vs. Parthia

SSL Certificate Authority